Tuesday, October 11, 2022

Jettisoning the Jeans: Chris by Unlimited Male


'I think what I enjoyed most about working with Chris was the fact that he was as comfortable with the nudity as he was. He also had a great sense of humor and was really laid back and a dream to work with.'


Jay (Unlimited Male) continues his exceptional integration of clothing in this series with the jettison of the jeans.   Again, I loved how  much Chris interacted with his clothing in so many of the images and so many of his poses.  Chris plays and teases the viewer with his t-shirt before eventually taking it off.


When Jay sent on this series, he included several shots of Chris fully erect, but wrote that he understood if I didn't include them.  I don't generally feature many erection shots on the blog, in part, as I don't often find them especially interesting or erotic.  They can also be a distraction, as in many cases, they take focus, diminishing the skill of the artist and  look of the model.


Were erection shots discussed or did they just 'come up' in the moment during the shoot? 
They just "came up." Chris actually got more than one erection during the shoot. The first erection happened without him even touching himself. 

It was an easy decision however, include the shots of Chris.  They flow so well with the feel and fun of the shoot and incorporate the shirt consistent with the other images from the series.  I also think they're incredibly hot, and love the sense of play between Chris and the camera.  This is especially evident in Jay's shots (below) of Chris looking at the camera, and then in the next shot, looking down at his erect penis.  





1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I love your site, but I don't really understand your reluctance to include erection shots (as you discussed in this set). I don't come to your site looking for porn--there's no lack of it in other places. But if a photographer makes a choice to include photos of guys erect within his work or within a particular collection, it seems to me that that's revealing of the photographer's point of view and intent. By systematically omitting erections, you seem too be "censoring" the photographer and, in a sense, providing your followers with only a partial experience of the photographer's eye.