I think I want a tattoo. Nothing as grand as the adorning the hunk above but something small on my shoulder blade or base of my back. The guy at the tattoo shop told me wanting a tattoo is not enough, I need to know what I want it of first... Great advice really but put me back to the beginning. Which came first for those who have one, wanting one, or wanting something specific?
We all have experienced being with someone who seems only able to take in a small percentage of what is actually around them. Someone who can be surrounded by beauty, a field of wild flowers yet...they only see weeds. Someone who can stand in front of an majestic piece of architecture and only see the flaws. I have an aunt who cannot see the beauty of any pet, the most regal of dogs or cutest of kittens, because the possible fur that will left on her furniture or floors is all she is able to visualize.
We all have a field of view, and it differs from person to person. The extent to which we are able to visually take in our world at any given moment depends on many factors from the biological to the psychological. Sometimes our previous interactions with someone or something dictate our ability to see it clearly. Sometimes our past experiences with a holiday, an event, a setting can limit our ability to focus on it without restriction.
There are some photographers, even many whose work I love, that have restrictions in focus. For any number of reasons, many seem to be only able to see a penis, a body, forgetting there is a man attached. For others, color is everything, while others see only in black and white. Many cannot seem to focus on anything but the model yet for some artists, the model is secondary to all that surrounds them.
Below: Brandon Kennedy
The most frustrating photo is the one we have all seen. An incredibly sexy man, clearly photogenic, with a great body, amazing face and eyes. The photographer however, seems to have no clue how to frame him, pose him or light him. Often it is assumed this is due to lack of skill or experience, but more often than not, I think it is due to a limited field of view.
Atlanta photographer Bob Burkhardt has a vast field of vision. Bob reports his actual professional training in photography is minimal, but that his years of experience in design have given him an eye for composition and the use of light. As with all artists I profile, my first experience with there work usually begins with just one image. With Bob Burkhardt, it was the image of Marvin which I used as pic of the day. The depth of his field of view was immediately evident with the lighting and use of color, the pose, the angle, the placement of the one piece of furniture. Every frame and aspect of the image was seamlessly planned and seen.
'I started working as a photographer about 15 years ago. Initially much of that time was spent shooting landscapes, flowers and architecture. I’ve always dabbled with shooting nudes, but never seriously pursued that interest until a modeling agency approached me five years ago. It took only one session before I was completely hooked.'
'My graphic design background draws me to create clean, crisp imagery. Light, and the way it interacts with a subject, fascinates me. My focus is on details, whether capturing a mood or following that alluring trace of light as it disappears sensuously down a subject’s back. I find inspiration in the work of George Hurrell, John Todaro, Maya Guez and Todd Hido. I strive to lure the viewer into his work, whether it is flowers, landscapes architecture or the human form... hopefully transforming my subject into an outstanding visual.'
My field of view for FH is a wide one but the focus is of course being the male form. As incredible as Burkhardt's images of men are, I found myself equally captivated by his other works, especially his architectural images. After 30 years as a graphic designer, Bob left his career to pursue his photography and opened a gallery with his partner. Bob co-owns and exhibits his own work in the pb&j gallery which features new openings about every two months. The current exhibit, Frames of Reference ends tonight and Art for the Holidays begins December 8th and runs through January 12th. In Bob's profile on the pb&J site you can see some of his other works and some of my favorite images are the architectural images especially his image of The Shiloh School in Hartwell GA. I also love his miscellaneous category which features many shots of windows, which regular readers of FH may remember is a favorite theme of mine within photography.
OK, lets start with Sarah Jessica Parker. The Kiki/Turkey Lurkey mash-up has to be one of the oddest things every. Horrid, God Awful and like other train wrecks, maybe the most compelling few minutes of the season. I had to re-watch to make sure it was as horrible/great as it first seemed. What is with Sarah Jessica's voice though. As a kid she belted out 'Tomorrow' as Annie 8 shows a week on Broadway. Why is it she cannot sing beyond a whisper these days???
One of my favorite parts of last night's Glee was the return of the graduates, most notably the first return of Dianna Agron as Quinn. Dianna is one of a handful of women who has me wanting to be straight again, if only for one night. There is something so damned sexy about her, she is not the shows greatest singer or dancer, but when she performs I can't take my eyes off her.
Speaking of eyes, I must say the casting department of the show has ensured that even when there are weak episodes, the male eye candy will make it worth it. Besides the usual suspects, (Harry, Chord and Darren) Jacob Artist and Blake Jenner are both incredibly appealing for different reasons and for different functions...
Dean Geyer is sex on a stick and it literally oozes out of every scene he is in. Grant Gustin and the Warblers are provide the perfect foundation for pretty much every fantasy I have every had about group sex. Gustin in dancing in his Dalton Academy uniform is pretty much perfection.
In checking through my stats the other day I was curious as to why my 2009 post on Grant Bowler (then on Ugly Betty) was getting so many hits. Only took me a minute to remember the bodacious body of Bowler's was the Dick, in last Sunday's airing of Liz and Dick.
I am a big fan of Bowler's, loved him in many of his roles, including recently on True Blood, but nothing could bring me to watch another Lohan train wreck. I like old 70's disaster movies as much as the next person but at the risk of sounding too self righteous, I don't believe this movie was many for any other reason than to exploit the actress in the lead role.
I am no fan of Lohan's but in this case the producers obviously were not going for any form of greatness. It is clear, given that they could not get Lohan on a reality show, this would serve as the net best thing. Elizabeth deserved more and I am sure she will get it. There are much better writers, actors and producers who will pay homage to this star down the road. Some have called this flick another 'Showgirls' but I hope it dies a quick death and just goes away, and stays there.
Caps from Australian series 'Blue Heelers' and 'Outrageous Fortune'.